This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
JHEOR
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Author Correction
    • Autoimmune Diseases
    • Brief Report
    • Cardiovascular Conditions
    • Commentary
    • Correspondence
    • Dermatological Diseases
    • Endocrine Diseases
    • Gastrointestinal Conditions
    • General Indications
    • Genetic Disorders
    • Hematology
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Methodology and Healthcare Policy
    • Musculoskeletal Conditions
    • Nephrologic/Hepatologic Conditions
    • Neurological Disorders
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Other Conditions
    • Perspective
    • Psychological Conditions
    • Respiratory Diseases
    • Trauma Induced Conditions
    • Urological/Gynecological Diseases
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Journal Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Bluesky (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:48324/feed
ISSN 2327-2236
Cardiovascular Conditions
Vol. 2, Issue 2, 2015June 12, 2015 EDT

Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment

Ken Okumura, Hiroshi Inoue, Masahiro Yasaka, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, A. Brett Hauber, Bennett Levitan, Zhong Yuan, Jean Baptiste Briere,
benefit-riskbleedingstroke preventiondiscrete-choice experimentconjoint-analysisanticoagulantsatrial fibrillationphysician preferencespatient preferences
Copyright Logoccby-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.36469/9904
JHEOR
1.
Okumura K, Inoue H, Yasaka M, et al. Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Discrete-choice Experiment. JHEOR. 2015;2(2):207-220. doi:10.36469/​9904

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system